In Reply to: I agree... posted by Saksimata on Friday, 26. November 2004 at 13:43 Bali Time:
That if all the evidence at a trial,suggests the accused,any accused is innocent or someone is falsely accused of a crime...
you would still say guilty because you believe they just had to have been 'naughty' somewhere! somehow before?
Therefore because of past 'naughtiness' (whether real or not),they deserve to go to gaol/be found guilty anyway?
Sorry if I've misunderstood you